It has been six weeks since I published the last post on this site. Myriad new topics and ideas to write about have accumulated in my drafts for new articles, but I was too busy to find enough time for converting them into high-quality articles I have been endeavored to deliver. Now, as I finally have got some free time, I want to talk about one of the things I did during the past period: trying out Gentoo, a source-based GNU/Linux distribution famous for letting its users compile almost every component of the operating system, including the Linux kernel.
I have been using Fedora for more than two years and satisfied with it, but my roommate’s recent hop to Arch Linux drew my attention to other GNU/Linux distributions that I had been aware of but had not bothered to research. He showed me a part of the installation progress, including creating disk partitions with command-line programs, and installing the most basic set of software enough to let the system boot entirely on its own (“bootstrapping”). Although I roughly learned the underlying steps of a general GNU/Linux installation process from Debian and Fedora’s installers, the idea of manually invoking the commands for those tasks hence control the entire system installation process sounded very cool.
So, I found myself looking at Gentoo’s website, because it shares some traits
with Arch Linux: both are rolling-release distributions, do not provide an
official graphical installer, require users to perform the bulk of installation
tasks manually with commands but reward them with plenty of space for choosing
most of the system components at their own discretion. That said, I favored
Gentoo over Arch Linux for some other reasons. First, compiling packages on my
own looked challenging but still manageable, given that I had successfully
compiled a utility for Raspberry Pi and created an RPM package for
it. Second, I found some positive reviews and comments on Portage,
Gentoo’s package manager, for features like maintaining a plain-text file
world that records every package the user explicitly asks it to install and
can be used to duplicate a system with the same set of installed packages.
Because I was tasked with an assignment that required use of a messily-packaged tool, the desire to keep my daily-driver system tidy made me sacrifice a system installed on a virtual machine to run it. With such a great interest in Gentoo, I chose it for the new virtual machine.
The goal of the system was just to provide a minimal command-line environment with software I would need. That tool was solely based on command-line, and I was fine with working in a terminal, so a graphical environment was not essential. In contrast, because Gentoo is a source-based distribution, installing a desktop environment would mean significantly longer installation time spent on compiling it. Plus, this was the first time I carried out an advanced manual GNU/Linux installation, so I wanted to start with just the minimum.
The Gentoo Handbook was my primary installation guide as I basically followed every step it instructed. I made the following customizations that required some extra tasks documented in not the Handbook itself, but other articles in the Gentoo Wiki:
I only created a single big partition and applied Btrfs to it, except the EFI System Partition (ESP) required for an UEFI installation (my virtual machine was configured to use UEFI). The Handbook suggested creating multiple partitions for boot partition, swap partition, and the root file system itself, but by using Btrfs subvolumes to isolate boot, home and root, this was unnecessary. For swap partition, I chose to go with zram, which is what Fedora uses since Fedora 33.
From system recovery perspective, Btrfs is a great file system choice for a system based on a rolling distribution, because it supports file system snapshots, which eases recovery of the system to a previous working state when an update breaks something. Alternatively, LVM snapshots can be used for this purpose, but I felt a Btrfs volume would be easier to manage than an LVM volume group.
Gentoo suggested using the kernel source with its own modifications and patches (
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources), but I was more interested in compiling the vanilla kernel (
sys-kernel/vanilla-sources). Isn’t it cool that when you run
uname -r, all you see is just the kernel version itself, without any extra labels added by your distribution vendor?
I wished to use the latest stable kernel (5.9) instead of the latest LTS kernel (5.4) Gentoo would install by default. To do this, I had to define a rule in
/etc/portage/package.accept_keywordsto use latest kernel versions that were not marked as stable by Gentoo. It is advisable to ensure the Linux kernel headers package
sys-kernel/linux-headersis on the latest version in companion, too. Because I was using Btrfs, the file system tools
btrfs-progsshould be on the latest version as well in order to use bleeding-edge Btrfs features offered by the latest kernel.
# /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords # Use the latest upstream stable kernel sys-kernel/vanilla-sources # Use the latest kernel headers in companion sys-kernel/linux-headers # Use the latest btrfs-progs in companion sys-fs/btrfs-progs
Although Gentoo’s default init system is OpenRC, which might be easier to configure for a first-time installer like me, I wanted to use systemd because it supports user services and I could not find the equivalent thing for OpenRC.
The Handbook fairly mentioned some caveats and steps specific to systemd, but it was easy to forget enabling some basic services for vital system functionality:
(chroot) # systemctl preset-all
I forgot to do this before rebooting into the installed system, and the system could not connect to network due to disabled
Tinkering with Kernel Configuration
I found the most time-consuming step in system installation being compiling the kernel. After all, there could be some performance penalty in a virtual machine which caused kernel compilation to be longer than usual. The most effective way to reduce kernel build time is to deactivate irrelevant kernel configuration options, like hardware support for hardware not installed on your system.
However, the prodigious amount of kernel configuration options and obscurity of the options’ effects can make this difficult. I was impressed by the countless models of hardware supported by Linux, but disabling every single option for hardware I did not have would be an ordeal. I was not sure about whether some options could be safely disabled either, because their purposes were not fully understood by me.
So, I ended up deactivating only the options that would add very much compile time if enabled and were for something I was sure I did not need, like the following for instance:
GPU support (
i915for Intel iGPUs,
nouveaufor NVIDIA GPUs). Every module listed here would take a while to compile. The virtual machine would not directly interface with my computer’s physical GPU; it would use the virtualization software’s graphics card, which was supported by other kernel modules. Note that when compiling a kernel to be directly used on a physical computer, you might need to enable some of them, depending on what GPU is installed.
InfiniBand. I had not even heard of this until I saw it in kernel configuration, so I supposed I did not need it. However, this heuristic is probably not applicable to other types of kernel configuration options. For example, there were some options for additional system calls activated by default, but I would not deactivate them only because I have not heard about them, since some programs might have dependency on them that is beyond my ken.
You might be able to disable some other hardware options without degrading system functionality. On a desktop PC without wireless connectivity, options for Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC and other hardware alike can be safely deactivated. If your computer is so old that it does not support NVMe, NVMe options may be disabled as well.
But, if I am not mistaken, it seems that kernel compilation on recent CPUs,
including even some old Intel dual-core laptop CPUs, can complete within ten
minutes. I have not tried building a kernel on a system
physically installed on my computer instead of a virtual machine yet, so I
cannot imagine completing the build in such a short time. (Edit: Well, I
did make a mistake here. The kernel build times concerned in the linked
webpage is only for building the kernel itself (i.e. the runtime of
vmlinux or a similar command); the bulk of the kernel building process would
be compiling the kernel modules if a generic kernel configuration is used. In
fact, I have tried to compile the kernel natively on my laptop with a dual-core
Intel Core i5-7200U, which could build the kernel itself in about 9 minutes but
would spend nearly an hour building the enabled kernel modules.) If this is
the case, the time spent going through the endless kernel configuration list is
very likely to exceed compile time saved by deactivating some options, so you
can simply use a kernel configuration with best compatibility, such as the one
ebuild file defines a Portage package. It is similar to
PKGBUILD in Arch Linux’s pacman and RPM SPEC file in Fedora, CentOS, RHEL,
etc. I have not tried to write a custom
ebuild for package not in Gentoo’s
official package catalog like I did for Raspberry Pi’s
userland package on
Fedora, but I found it very pleasant to work with existing ones
provided by Gentoo packagers.
Since I was using Btrfs and wanted to use snapshots for quicker system
recovery, I planned to install Snapper. It came to my
attention that the latest upstream version of Snapper was 0.8.14, but the
ebuild in Gentoo’s official repository was for 0.8.9.
My experience in maintaining the
userland package and some other RPM SPECs I
wrote for desktop GUI programs told me that when the upstream released a new
version of the program, I could usually just bump the version number in the RPM
SPEC and rebuild the updated package without problems. To my surprise, for
ebuild, the file itself need not be changed at all in most cases,
because a Portage package’s version is defined in its file name. This meant
that all I needed to do in order to build Snapper 0.8.14 was to simply rename
On Fedora, if I want to install a custom package like a normal package shipped by Fedora, I will build the package from the RPM SPEC I have written and copy it to a custom repository designated for my self-built packages. I must save the RPM SPEC file somewhere else because it is not included in the generated package. Should I want to change the SPEC file, I need to find the saved SPEC file, modify it, rebuild the package, and copy it to my RPM repository again.
On Gentoo, the whole process is more streamlined: after I am satisfied with my
ebuild file, I only need to drop the
ebuild, instead of a prebuilt
package in any form, into my own repository. If I want to make changes to the
package later, I can modify the
ebuild at the same place, without reaching
out to a file stored somewhere else. All files required to build and install
the package can be maintained within a single location, which is my own custom
Below is a table comparing the experience of maintaining a self-defined package on Fedora and Gentoo. Thanks to Portage being designed as a package manager for a source-based distribution, no extra step is required for building the package on Gentoo.
|Task||On Fedora||On Gentoo|
|Define package metadata and how the package is built||Write an RPM SPEC||Write an
|Build the package||
(Performed automatically when installing the package with
|Add the package to custom software repository||Copy the generated RPM to the repository||Copy the
|Install the package||
|Bump package version||Modify package version in RPM SPEC||Rename the
|Build updated package||
(Performed automatically when updating the package with
|Update the package in custom software repository||Copy the new RPM to the repository||Already done
|Install the updated package||
More information about creating a custom
ebuild repository can be found in
this Gentoo Wiki article. The “simple version bump”
section precisely describes how I installed Snapper 0.8.14
when the latest version distributed by Gentoo was just 0.8.9. You might also
wish to assign your own custom repository a higher
priority so Portage will prefer packages in it to those
in the official Gentoo repository.
# /etc/portage/repos.conf/local.conf [local] location = /var/db/repos/local priority = -999 # Gentoo's repository has a priority of -1000
I am probably not able to give complete and responsible advice about what kind of people should use Gentoo, because I have neither used it as a daily driver nor installed some popular applications on it except Git, Vim and tmux. But I still hope my ephemeral experience with it can give some ideas about the group of users Gentoo is most suitable for.
Gentoo is a great distribution for the following kinds of users:
People who need to build a lot of programs that are not packaged by common GNU/Linux distributions and/or the bleeding-edge version of packages, and want to manage these programs with the system’s package manager. For example, the author of http://rglinuxtech.com/, which I discovered when searching for a solution to the Raspberry Pi USB issue, seems to enjoy building the
rcversions of Linux kernel. If he would like to let the system’s package manager take care of the
rckernels, then Gentoo would be the distribution for him.
Of course, you may choose to manage self-built programs on your own, but chances are it is hard to maintain the list of files that belong to each program, which may lead to leftover files after you uninstall a program. One possible solution is GNU Stow, but you must remember to run it every time you modify an installed program. Portage and custom
ebuildfiles can streamline the entire maintenance process: write the
ebuild(which is very similar to a shell script that builds and installs the program), run
emerge, and let Portage handle everything else.
Any users who are familiar with a distribution alike, e.g. Arch Linux, but want to fine-tune compiler options to get the best performance, or want to get rid of systemd and use OpenRC instead. systemd has taken over the majority of popular GNU/Linux distributions, including Arch Linux, which claims that it only officially supports systemd despite being a distribution strived to give user eclectic choices on packages.
People with a good foundation of knowledge on GNU/Linux and want to learn more about the internals of the operating system. Speaking of myself, I learned about Linux kernel’s capabilities and knowledge about kernel modules in the process of configuring the kernel, and perhaps no other mainstream GNU/Linux distribution could offer me the incentive to delve into this realm.
These kinds of users should think twice before deciding to use Gentoo:
Users who are choosing a distribution for a computer with constrained hardware resources. On weak CPUs, including the ARM chip on my Raspberry Pi and the virtualized CPU of my virtual machine, kernel compilation can take hours, if not forever. Source code of programs you have built can also occupy a few gigabytes that might be precious space if your disk is not large. On my Gentoo installation with only a few user-installed programs and no desktop environment, the size of source code archives for all installed packages is 1223 MiB, and Linux 5.9.8’s source tree takes 1074 MiB. More space would be occupied if I had installed a desktop environment.
$ du -s -B M /var/cache/distfiles /usr/src/linux-5.9.8 1223M /var/cache/distfiles 1074M /usr/src/linux-5.9.8
Gentoo leaves the job of building software packages to users themselves, whereas other binary-based distributions compile the programs for the users. By choosing a binary-based distribution, you can have some other people complete the performance-hungry job for you, which might be preferable if your computer is not a powerful one.
People who are still new to GNU/Linux and/or building software from source. You can definitely learn a lot from configuring and using Gentoo, but it requires some basic knowledge, skills, and understanding of GNU/Linux. I would suggest starting with another distribution that is more easy to set up and maintain, then consider switching to Gentoo only when you are confident about installing Arch Linux.